Is the Problem of Suffering the strongest argument against God? David Robertson vs Stephen Law hosted by Andy Kind

The podcast opens with the question of whether the problem of suffering serves as the strongest argument against the existence of a benevolent God. Both participants, Dr. Stephen Law and Rev. David Robertson, explore the idea that the sheer volume and degree of suffering in the world may suggest that a truly good God cannot exist. Stephen Law references examples of historical and ongoing suffering to build his case, making the argument that if God is all-powerful and all-good, He would not allow unnecessary suffering to occur. This sets the stage for their debate on the implications of suffering for theism.

Dr. Law introduces the 'Evil God Hypothesis,' suggesting that belief in an evil God is as plausible as belief in a good God, given the amount of suffering in the world. He argues that if a good God exists, there must be justifications for every form of suffering, which he believes are often implausible. He claims that the existence of gratuitous suffering challenges belief in an ultimately benevolent deity, thus compelling his audience to reconsider their views on God and morality.

Rev. David Robertson counters Dr. Law’s arguments by positioning suffering as a reason to believe in a good God rather than a reason to doubt His existence. He emphasizes that Christianity provides context and solutions to the problem of suffering through the narrative of Jesus Christ and His redemptive suffering. Robertson suggests that, while suffering is indeed a part of human experience, God uses it to cultivate good and provide meaning, ultimately pointing to the importance of faith and hope.

The discussion touches upon the philosophical concept of skeptical theism — the idea that humans are not in a position to understand God’s reasons for allowing suffering. Law critiques this stance, suggesting it leads to moral relativism and undermines the belief in a truly good God. In contrast, Robertson defends the notion of absolute morality rooted in God's existence, arguing that without God, concepts of right and wrong become meaningless. They represent the broader philosophical debate between theists and atheists regarding the foundation of moral values.

In conclusion, the episode delves into the contrasting views on suffering. Dr. Law's stance emphasizes the need for a rational justification that is often absent in the face of suffering, while Rev. Robertson focuses on the capacity of faith, through Christianity, to provide answers and hope amidst pain. The thoughtful discussion urges listeners to reflect deeply on their beliefs in the context of human suffering and the nature of God.