Unbelievable?

Does God Exist? The Ontological Argument Debate 🤔✨ Dr Gavin Ortlund vs AOC favourite agnostic Joe Schmid

· Summarized

Share this episode
Anyone with this link can open it.
Share Link
Start at 0:00

Key takeaways

  • The ontological argument attempts to prove God's existence through rationality and conceptual analysis rather than empirical evidence.
  • There is a significant difference between a priori reasoning (independent of experience) and a posteriori reasoning (based on empirical evidence).
  • Historical critiques, such as Kant’s objections and parody arguments, have shaped the understanding and acceptance of the ontological argument in philosophical discussions.
  • Modal versions of the ontological argument explore necessity and possibility, prompting inquiries about God's existence across different possible realities.
  • Philosophical debates concerning the ontological argument encourage deeper reflection on the nature of being, existence, and the essence of God.

Summary

Introduction to the Ontological Argument Debate

In this episode, host Vince Vitale introduces a discussion centered on the ontological argument for God's existence. Joined by Christian theologian Dr. Gavin Ortlund and agnostic philosopher Joe Schmid, the conversation aims to explore various aspects of the argument, its historical significance, and contemporary relevancy. The host highlights the importance of this philosophical argument, which attempts to demonstrate God's existence through reason and conceptual analysis.

Understanding the Ontological Argument

The ontological argument posits that if we can conceive of a perfect being (God), then that being must exist in reality since existence is a perfection. Anselm’s version of the argument is introduced alongside its implications for modern philosophical discourse. Both guests discuss different formulations of the argument, emphasizing its a priori nature, meaning it relies solely on reasoning rather than empirical evidence. The abstractness of such arguments leads to deeper inquiries into the nature of existence and the concept of God.

A Priori vs. A Posteriori Reasoning

In the discussion, Gavin and Joe differentiate between a priori reasoning, which is independent of experience, and a posteriori reasoning, which depends on empirical evidence. They emphasize the unique position of ontological arguments being rooted in rational thought rather than physical observation, a feature that both intrigues and challenges listeners.

Critiques and Historical Perspectives

The dialogue touches upon historical critiques of the ontological argument, including Kant's assertion that existence is not a predicate and Guanilo's parody involving the concept of a perfect island. The discussion dives into how these critiques have shaped and challenged the reception of the argument throughout philosophical history, raising questions about its validity and implications.

Modal Ontological Arguments

Joe articulates modal versions of the ontological argument, exploring arguments based on necessity and possibility. He explains Alvin Plantinga's version, which argues that if God is possible, then he is necessary. Gavin reflects on the strengths and vulnerabilities of modal arguments compared to Anselm's original formulation, noting the potential for parity objections that can counter these arguments.

Final Thoughts and Reflection

Towards the end of the episode, Vince summarizes the depth of the conversation regarding the ontological argument, urging listeners to engage with these profound philosophical inquiries about existence and God's nature. Both guests share insights about the relevance of these discussions in modern philosophy and personal belief systems.

Sponsors

  • Truth Unites · Gavin is the president of Truth Unites, a theologian, and author of nine books.
  • Majesty of Reason · Joe is a Philosophy PhD student at Princeton University, specializing in metaphysics and philosophy of religion.

Show notes

In this thought-provoking episode of Premier Unbelievable, host Vince Vitale is joined by two brilliant minds to unpack the ontological argument for the existence of God: ✨ Dr. Gavin Ortlund – President of Truth Unites, theologian, author, and YouTuber and 🎓 Joe Schmid – Philosophy PhD student at Princeton, metaphysics expert, creator of Majesty of Reason and Alex O'Connor's favourite young agnostic.

In this thought-provoking episode, we explore:
🔹 Anselm's famous ontological argument and its philosophical legacy
🔹 A priori reasoning and what it means for theology and metaphysics
🔹 Modal arguments and the concepts of necessary vs. contingent existence
🔹 Critiques, including Kant’s objections and parody arguments

This dynamic conversation unpacks the complexities of God’s existence, philosophical rationality, and the nature of being itself. Whether you're a philosopher, theologian, or curious skeptic, this episode will challenge your perspective and expand your understanding. 🌌📚

Meet the Guests:
1️⃣ Joe Schmid
Joe is a Philosophy PhD student at Princeton University, specializing in metaphysics and philosophy of religion. He has co-authored the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on ontological arguments and written two books: Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs and The Majesty of Reason. On his YouTube channel, Majesty of Reason, Joe creates lectures and hosts philosophical discussions.
📚 Follow Joe Schmid:
🌐 Website: josephschmid.com
▶️ YouTube: Majesty of Reason
🐦 Twitter/X: @majestyofreason

2️⃣ Dr. Gavin Ortlund
Gavin is the President of Truth Unites, a theologian, and author of nine books, including Why God Makes Sense in a World That Doesn’t and What It Means to Be Protestant. He holds a PhD in historical theology from Fuller Seminary and is a fellow of several esteemed organizations, including the Keller Center for Cultural Apologetics. Gavin also shares content on theology, apologetics, and church history through his YouTube channel, Truth Unites.
📚 Follow Dr. Gavin Ortlund:
🌐 Website: truthunites.org
▶️ YouTube: Truth Unites
📸 Instagram: truth.unites
👍 Facebook: Truth Unites Page
🐦 Twitter/X: @gavinortlund

👉 What do you think? Can the ontological argument prove God’s existence, or is it just a fascinating mental exercise? Let us know in the comments below!

🎧 Listen now on your favourite podcast platform or watch the full video for more deep philosophical insights!

#Philosophy #Theology #ExistenceOfGod #OntologicalArgument #Anselm #Metaphysics #Kant #Agnosticism #FaithAndReason #PhilosophicalDebate #GodExists #LogicAndReason #PhilosophyPodcast

SOCIAL LINKS
Twitter: https://twitter.com/unbelievablefe
Facebook: / https://facebook.com/premierunbelievable
Instagram: / https://instagram.com/premierunbelievable
Tik Tok: / https://tiktok.com/@premier.unbelievable

👉 Get bonus content, updates, fascinating articles, and early access to new episodes—absolutely free! Join now at www.premierunbelievable.com 🎉📢

• Subscribe to the Unbelievable? podcast: https://pod.link/267142101
• More shows, free eBook & newsletter: https://premierunbelievable.com
• For live events: http://www.unbelievable.live
• For online learning: https://www.premierunbelievable.com/training
• Support us in the USA: http://www.premierinsight.org/unbelievableshow
• Support us in the rest of the world: https://www.premierunbelievable.com/donate

Follow this show on AudioBrevity and new episodes get summarized for you. Create a free account

Couldn't load the audio. A blocker may be stopping the show's tracking links. Open the file