The Daily
The Fishermen Who Could End Federal Regulation as We Know It
This episode isn’t summarized yet
Create a free account and summarize it. In a few minutes you’ll have the key takeaways and a section-by-section summary.
Show notes
On its surface, the case before the Supreme Court — a dispute brought by fishing crews objecting to a government fee — appears to be routine.
But, as Adam Liptak, who covers the court for The Times explains, the decision could transform how every industry in the United States is regulated.
Guest: Adam Liptak, a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- How a fight over a fishing regulation could help tear down the administrative state.
- The case is part of a long-game effort to sap regulation of business.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Amazon Music. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.