HBR On Strategy

Stress Test Your Strategy Before It Fails

· Summarized

Share this episode
Anyone with this link can open it.
Share Link
Start at 0:00

Key takeaways

  • War gaming is a strategic simulation technique borrowed from the military, used to test and stress-test business strategies.
  • It involves understanding the competitive landscape, defining industry battles, and creating detailed scenarios to anticipate possible futures.
  • War gaming provides actionable insights through creating playbooks that outline specific responses to various scenarios, turning insights into real plans.
  • Regular practice, ideally once a year or more frequently in fast-moving industries, helps organizations remain prepared and adaptable.
  • Successfully integrating war gaming requires cultural openness, resource allocation, and ongoing commitment to learning and adaptation.

Summary

Introduction to Corporate War Gaming

The podcast opens with an explanation of corporate war gaming, a disciplined form of scenario planning borrowed from the military. Arjun Singh discusses how this approach helps companies test strategies, identify blind spots, and simulate competitive responses. Unlike traditional scenario planning, war gaming incorporates likely actions of competitors and stakeholders, translating scenarios into pragmatic actions. This method is vital for companies aiming to anticipate market shifts and competitive moves before they happen, serving as a strategic rehearsal.

The Methodology of War Gaming in Business

Singh details the structure of business war gaming, including the levels of strategic, operational, and tactical games. He emphasizes the importance of defining the 'battle' or industry context clearly to avoid being blindsided by new entrants or shifts. The process involves brainstorming impactful scenarios, prioritizing them based on potential impact, and creating detailed playbooks that outline responses to various futures, ensuring organizations are prepared for diverse possibilities.

Applications and Benefits of War Gaming

The episode highlights numerous real-world examples, such as the pharmaceutical industry’s use of war gaming to prepare for regulatory challenges and market entry barriers. Singh emphasizes that wars games help companies avoid costly mistakes, uncover new opportunities, and align teams around clear action plans. The creation of playbooks turns insights into concrete steps, facilitating swift organizational responses when scenarios unfold. War gaming also reveals vulnerabilities and shifts organizational mindsets towards proactive strategy development.

Challenges and Risks in War Gaming

Singh discusses hurdles such as resource constraints, cultural resistance, and the time required to conduct thorough war gaming sessions. Some organizations shy away from this process due to hierarchical barriers or skepticism about its value. Also, incorrect assumptions or a lack of comprehensive background info can lead companies astray, but continuous tracking and adaptation help mitigate these issues. The importance of ongoing practice—ideally annually—is stressed to keep strategies relevant amidst changing environments.

Implementing and Sustaining War Gaming Practices

The conversation covers best practices for incorporating war gaming into organizational routines, like integrating it into annual planning cycles and tailoring exercises to different functional areas. Singh advocates for simplicity in design, especially for startups or resource-limited teams, and emphasizes the value of learning from exercises to improve future responses. He underscores that continuous, disciplined war gaming can significantly enhance strategic resilience, especially in fast-moving markets or during high-stakes negotiations.

Sponsors

  • Harvard Business Review · This episode was produced by Mary Doe and me, Hannah Bates. Kurt Nickish is our editor, special thanks to Ian Fox, Maureen Hoek, Erica Trucksler, Ramzi Kabaz, Nicole Smith, Ann Bartholomew, and you, our listener. See you next week.

Show notes

While many teams and organizations engage in scenario planning, most don’t go far enough. Arjan Singh, consultant and adjunct professor at Southern Methodist University, says a more disciplined approach, borrowed from the military, can help leaders truly test how their strategies, operations, and tactics hold up against competitors, shifting market dynamics, and unexpected events. He’s helped hundreds of companies identify risks and find new ways to innovate by leading them through corporate war games, and he explains his process and results. Singh is the author of the book Competitive Success: Building Winning Strategies with Corporate War Games.

Follow this show on AudioBrevity and new episodes get summarized for you. Create a free account

Couldn't load the audio. A blocker may be stopping the show's tracking links. Open the file