If the Bible Was Written by Humans, Does that Change Its Reliability?

Tim reflects on the journey of learning about how the Bible was formed, sharing insights that evolved over the years. In response to Alison's question, he acknowledges that since the previous sermon series a decade ago, he has discovered more about the historical context and the different interpretations of various texts, particularly the Apocrypha. He notes that early Christian leaders recognized diverse literature surrounding the Hebrew Bible that differed from community to community, leading to a more nuanced understanding of scripture.

Addressing Guinevere's query, Tim and Jon explore the implications of the Bible being written by humans yet inspired by God. They discuss how minor inconsistencies, such as differing ages of biblical figures across texts, might arise from human error in transcription or interpretations. They affirm that such differences do not detract from the Bible's reliability in conveying divine truth but suggest that it enhances understanding through varied perspectives.

Jody's question prompts a discussion on the concept of 'the Word of God.' Tim explains that the term encompasses both the spoken word of God as seen in Genesis and the written scriptures. They highlight the distinction between the eternal Word of God, which is Jesus, and scripture, which bears witness to Jesus's message. This conversation reveals the complexity of biblical terminology and how the Bible's texts aim to guide readers in understanding God's will.

Rory's query leads to a robust exploration of how the Bible's editing process interacts with biblical texts that caution against altering God's Word. Tim emphasizes that these cautionary texts refer to maintaining the integrity of the covenant relationship rather than dictating the editing of scripture. He illustrates the historical context of editing specific biblical texts and reassures that it served to clarify meaning rather than dilute authority.

Both Megan and Zach's inquiries lead to discussing non-canonical texts such as the Gospel of Mary and Thomas, as well as the Apostolic Fathers. Tim explains the difference between orthodox works that align closely with apostolic teaching and Gnostic literature that strays from it. He encourages readers to explore these texts as valuable historical insights without necessarily equating them with scriptural authority.